Jonathan Turley: The Fix is in for a "Pirate Victory"

Well, as the really patriotic defenders of the Fourth Amendment feared, the criminals in our government--and I include the Senators who failed to uphold their oath of office--have won.

I excerpt here Glenn Greenwald's comments and refer you to a You Tube clip, an interview with Prof. Jonathan Turley, who points out that a Federal judge just a few days ago in his opinion indicated clearly that President (yeah, I know, my maw churns with bile at the word) George W. Bush is an admitted multiple felon.

First Glenn Greenwald:

With their vote today, the Democratic-led Congress has covered-up years of deliberate surveillance crimes by the Bush administration and the telecom industry, and has dramatically advanced a full-scale attack on the rule of law in this country. As I noted earlier today, Law Professor and Fourth Amendment expert Jonathan Turley was on MSNBC's Countdown with Rachel Maddow last night and gave as succinct an explanation for what Democrats -- not the Bush administration, but Democrats -- have done today. Anyone with any lingering doubts about what is taking place today in our country should watch this:

Go to YouTube for the video of Rachel Maddow on Countdown last night and her interview with Professor Jonathan Turley.


And Greenwald continues:

What is most striking is that when the Congress was controlled by the GOP -- when the Senate was run by Bill Frist and the House by Denny Hastert -- the Bush administration attempted to have a bill passed very similar to the one that just passed today. But they were unable to do so. The administration had to wait until Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats took over Congress before being able to put a corrupt end to the scandal that began when, in December of 2005, the New York Times revealed that the President had been breaking the law for years by spying on Americans without the warrants required by law.

Yet again, the Democratic Congress ignored the views of their own supporters in order to comply with the orders and wishes of the Bush administration.

And later: "Somehow, at some point, someone somewhere convinced [Democrats] that the best way to avoid appearing weak is to be as weak as possible."

Read Greenwald's complete article HERE.

Some observations:


1. The weak Democrats can go to hell.


2. Most citizens of the United States, including some good friends of mine, could give a rat's ass about the fact that their President is a self-admitted lawbreaker, or that the government now has the means to spy on them, their credit transactions, their emails, their telephone conversations, their text messages. They don't have anything to hide. They won't understand until a double entendre, or an incautious joke, or a monetary transaction gets looked at by a Homeland Security bureaucrat and they get called on the carpet, or fall under suspicion of being "up to something."


3. Few Americans understood that the first FISA bill in 1977 was the start of the erosion of the Fourth Amendment. In other words, we are at the bottom of the slippery slope.


4. The telecoms have spent millions to grease the palms of Democrats and Republicans alike. Change your phone to Qwest if you have their service. They refused to break the law when Bush told them to, and they refused almost nine months BEFORE 9/11/2001. So much for the national security arguments.


5. No, I revise my invective: screw the Democrats. Only 28 of them understood the meaning of their oath of office.


6. Clearly, we need to watch out for Obama. Despite his explanations and rationale for why he supports the bill, he's no fool. It gives him power to break the law if or when he is elected president. Don't rely on his good faith or integrity. He voted for it. Worse, he know it was going to fail. What would he have lost by voting against it or trying to make the arguments he gave at the end of 2007 when he didn't have the nomination? Obviously the telecoms' high regard. Just another politician. Screw him too.

6.1: Senators voting against and upholding their oath of office: Akaka - Biden - Bingaman - Boxer - Brown - Byrd - Cantwell - Cardin - Clinton - Dodd - Dorgan - Durbin - Feingold - Harkin - Kerry - Klobachur - Lautenberg - Leahy - Levin - Menendez - Murray - Reed - Reid - Sanders - Schumer - Stabenow - Tester - Wyden. Hillary Clinton voted against it!


7. Upon further reflection, fuck the Democrats. Especially the ones in the House who brought the legislation under the cynical leadership of Steney Hoyer, and violated their oath of office.


8. It will be a long haul until we purge the Congress of all of these slimy bastards.


9. Think of one good reason why Nancy Pelosi took "impeachment off the table," and why the nuclear option is still "on the table."


10. Reread Tom Paine over the summer. Or read him.

A Sad Day for Democrats and Obama Supporters

Remember this day. On this day, the Democrats proved for the umpteenth time what a party of collusion rather than opposition thay have become when they passed the FISA bill containing what amounts to an amnesty provision for telecom companies.

Worst of all, Senator Obama, whose word is rapidly becoming more assured as the voice of the party, came out and said he accepted the compromise bill. He said he would fight the amnesty provision in the Senate, but I don't think this is anything but cover. Read his words:

It is not all that I would want. But given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as President, I will carefully monitor the program, review the report by the Inspectors General, and work with the Congress to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives -– and the liberty –- of the American people.

This is a politician's bullshit. Notice that he doesn't say that amnesty is wrong any more. He sees that the bill gives the Presidency another little fillip of tyranny and he will not look that gift horse in the mouth. It's a sad day.

In my own Congressional District, I was very fearful that Adam Schiff would end up capitulating with the spineless. He did indeed vote for the bill, and I publish here the letter I sent to him quoting from his own letter to me back in the spring when I had written to him concerned about giving amnesty to the telephone companies who went along with George Bush's violations of the law. (Remember, Bush himself admitted he broke the law in a press conference and said that he would continue to do so. ) This amnesty provision will--unless there is a brave FISA judge out there--almost automatically dismiss any lawsuits permanently. It's a very sad day. My letter will sum up the reason for my sadness.

326 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Representative Adam Schiff

Re: Your Vote on the FISA and Telecom Amnesty Bill

Dear Congressman Schiff:

I have just reviewed the record of the vote. Your name was in the Yeas. Disturbing.
Let me quote from your letter to me of April 9, 2008:

On March 14^th, the House voted to pass a bill—the FISA Amendment Act of 2008—that did not include immunity for the telecom companies. The final vote in the House was 213-197 and I voted in favor of this legislation.

However, the suggestion of the Administration that we can only [be aggressive in combating terrorism]by subverting the law and giving up our constitutional right is seriously misguided.

Yet despite this, the bill you voted for today—against your apparent position of understanding that the Administration was wrong—is not in the interests of the citizens of this country. I can anticipate receiving rhetoric from you to justify your vote, and further obfuscation that will essentially repeat the rationalizations of your ''seriously misguided” colleagues Hoyer, Emmanuel, and Speaker Pelosi. Some Democratic opposition you have become. Save the rhetoric, please.

It is clear that you now would let this administration escape liability for its unconstitutional acts. You now would let the predictable assurances of Attorney General Mukasy that a telecom company had “acted in good faith after assurances from the Justice Department” completely preclude any possible discovery proving that the Administration had broken the law. In short, you now have become a party to the collusion. All your talk now about wanting to preserve FISA as the exclusive remedy will not hold water. The fact is that telecom immunity could still have been excluded if you and other overly compliant congressmen had truly wanted to protect the Fourth Amendment. In other words, as Senator Bond said today, "When the Government tells you to do something, I think you all recognize, uh, that that is something that you need to do." A nation of sheep.

In all of our history,with its few instances of impeachment and threatened impeachment, this President alone has been more culpable than any other and liable for impeachment. Yet Congress has not had the courage to hold him accountable as the Constitution provides. In this one instance when we clearly know by his own admission that the President broke the law and would continue to break it, your action today has let him pass unscathed. The proof? Other telecom companies refused to comply!

I am deeply disturbed by your lack of courage and leadership on this matter. You have not only betrayed my trust in you but have betrayed your own principles. You have not done your duty.

Sincerely,

To be sure, it's a sad day for the Fourth Amendment and a sad day for all of us who understand that this President has moved us further and faster in seven and a half years from a democratic republic than any one would have thought. Damn the Democrats who have gone along with this terrible capitulation to the politics of fear, paranoia, and vengeance.